--- title: "fandom.com Backlink Value & Traffic Report" url: https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com description: "fandom.com: a followed link from it is worth $147 by BV 2.9 (link type C). About 714.8M visits a month, 73% organic. 340,202 websites link to it." site: mxverify generated: 2026-11-05T07:52:36.224Z --- # Backlink value and traffic report for fandom.com **In short:** A new followed link from fandom.com is worth about $147 to rankings by BV 2.9 (level C, Site Strength 90 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. It gets about 714.8M visits a month, 73% from organic search, down 15% since Jul 2026. No link placed on it has been audited. First recorded 04 November 2026 · Last updated 04 November 2026 · [Visit fandom.com](https://fandom.com/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) [Compare](https://mxverify.uk/compare/fandom.com#add) Show fandom.com's BV badge on your site The badge shows what a link from fandom.com is worth, as this report does, and updates by itself. It links to this report. Embed code (HTML) Copied Paste it where the badge should appear. ## Backlink value · what one new followed link from fandom.com is worth to rankings [BV **$147** per link · level C · strength 90](https://bklink.uk/methodology?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report#bv) reading confidence **High, 76 out of 100** Reading confidence 76 / 100 - What we read 90 - Our model's certainty 80 - Its view of the pages 68 8 of 10 pages read had text · 49 links to other sites seen How much of fandom.com we read, and how sure our model was about the kind of link it gives. Never higher than what we read. [The full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#reading) **Priced from our reading of the site.** No reliable sample of checked links yet: its link type comes from the articles mxverify read on the site. Priced 5 Nov 2026 · pages read 5 Nov 2026. **Relevance to the linked site moves it** **$73** unrelated ×0.5 **$184** same topic ×1.25 **By the kind of link it gives** - A editorial $1,477 - B guest, sponsored $739 - C neutralised $148 - D network $74 Priced on a blend of link types: B 1% · C 90% · D 9% → ×0.1. [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#bv-detail) · BV 2.9 · not a price anyone charges **[714.8M](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#traffic)** monthly visits −15% since Jul 2026 **[524.1M](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#traffic)** from organic search 73% of visits **[340,202](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#links-in)** sites link to it 41,487 of them nofollow **[1996](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/1990s)** domain registered 30 years ago **[2.4 s](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#tech)** page load for real users (LCP) does not pass Core Web Vitals **[88%](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#reading)** of its own links nofollow in the articles we read ## How it compares · among 22 entertainment sites on mxverify - A new followed link from it is worth more than a link from 95% of entertainment sites. - Priced at level C, like 55% of entertainment sites; 0% are level A. Peers are the most specific group of at least 20 sites on mxverify it belongs to: its topic, its category or its kind of site. Figures are third-party traffic estimates and mxverify's BV, as elsewhere on this report. **Monthly visits** Jul 2026: 845.1M visits; Aug 2026: 814.6M visits; Sept 2026: 714.8M visits **Where visitors come from** Organic search 73%, Direct 18%, Social 4.5%, Referrals 3.9%, AI assistants 0.2% - [Organic search](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/organic-search) **73%** - [Direct](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/direct) **18%** - [Social](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/social) **4.5%** - [Referrals](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/referrals) **3.9%** - AI assistants **0.2%** Organic search, in green, is the traffic BV prices on. **Top countries** - [United States](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/united-states) 35% - [Russia](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/russia) 7.8% - [United Kingdom](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/united-kingdom) 5.0% - [Canada](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/canada) 3.7% - [Germany](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/germany) 3.6% - Other countries 45% ## Links to this site Links other sites have made to fandom.com, from outside link indexes: not the links placed on it that bklink audits. **340,202** websites link to it 41,487 of them with nofollow links **45M** links in all, from those websites about 132 per website · first seen 2019 **22** spam score of its links 0–100, the linking pages' average **126,236** IP addresses they link from 53,156 subnets **Where the links sit:** 23% in the article or main content of the linking page, 21% in its header, menu, sidebar or footer · 50% in no page section the index could name, the rest in other sections; of the 39.1M links it sorted by where they sit **Pages in Google:** about 62,000,000 · the count Google gives for a site: search, its own estimate, which can be far off either way What Google shows for site:fandom.com — the first 10 pages 1. [Michael Landon - Little House on the Prairie Wiki - Fandom](https://littlehouse.fandom.com/wiki/Michael_Landon?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) littlehouse.fandom.com/wiki/Michael_Landon 2. [Gloria - Madagascar Wiki - Fandom](https://madagascar.fandom.com/wiki/Gloria?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) madagascar.fandom.com/wiki/Gloria 3. [The Hunger Games Wiki - Fandom](https://thehungergames.fandom.com/wiki/The_Hunger_Games_Wiki?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) thehungergames.fandom.com/wiki/The_Hunger_Games_Wiki 4. [Miss Piggy | Character-community Wiki - Fandom](https://charactercommunity.fandom.com/wiki/Miss_Piggy?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) charactercommunity.fandom.com/wiki/Miss_Piggy 5. [Suzy Sheep - Peppa Pig Wiki - Fandom](https://peppapig.fandom.com/wiki/Suzy_Sheep?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) peppapig.fandom.com/wiki/Suzy_Sheep 6. [The Witcher 3 witcher gear - Witcher Wiki - Fandom](https://witcher.fandom.com/wiki/The_Witcher_3_witcher_gear?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) witcher.fandom.com/wiki/The_Witcher_3_witcher_gear 7. [Gandalf - Tolkienpedia - Fandom](https://esdla.fandom.com/wiki/Gandalf?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) esdla.fandom.com/wiki/Gandalf 8. [Buck | Ice Age Wiki - Fandom](https://iceage.fandom.com/wiki/Buck?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) iceage.fandom.com/wiki/Buck 9. [Aaron Pierre | Krypton Wiki - Fandom](https://krypton.fandom.com/wiki/Aaron_Pierre?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) krypton.fandom.com/wiki/Aaron_Pierre 10. [Soul Land Wiki - Fandom](https://soulland.fandom.com/wiki/Soul_Land_Wiki?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) soulland.fandom.com/wiki/Soul_Land_Wiki Sources: link counts and spam score from a third-party backlink index, read 05 November 2026; the chart grows by one reading a month; page count and pages from a Google site: search, 05 November 2026. BV prices on one of these only, the page count: when two site: searches at least 7 days apart both find no pages, and nothing on record shows Google indexing the site, a link from it is priced at most level C. ## Links placed here No link placed on fandom.com has been audited yet. [An audit on bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) checks each one — still there, followed or not, where it sits — and marks this report audited. This report's link to fandom.com is nofollow. It is followed when the site's owner audits fandom.com's own backlinks on bklink.uk, chooses to publish it and proves the site is theirs (for 90 days from each audit), or once a one-time payment of $9 is made for it. [When a link here is followed](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#followed-links) ## How it links out **12%** of its links followed **49** links to other sites **10** articles read Followed 12% Nofollow 88% Strong sample Read 5 Nov 2026 · its homepage offers advertising · [the full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#reading) ## Domain and hosting - **Domain registered**: [11 October 1996](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/1990s) - **Content category**: [entertainment](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/entertainment) - **Server address**: 162.159.142.170 · CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites - **Hosting network**: Cloudflare (CDN) · AS13335 · US ## Tech stack The homepage could not be read on 05 Nov 2026 (HTTP 403); it is tried again within a week. ### Page speed Chrome users, 28 days to 1 Nov 2026: LCP 2.4 s · INP 110 ms · CLS 0.15 — does not pass Core Web Vitals. Data from the Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0. Devices: 46% phone · 44% desktop · 10% tablet — share of Chrome page loads, same 28 days. Sources: ad load from a web technology index, 05 Nov 2026. ## Similar sites Matched on the subject the two sites share. Never a site on the same server or network. - [newgrounds.com BV $380 · level B B Gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/newgrounds.com) - [nerdbot.com BV $211 · level B B Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/nerdbot.com) - [dlelist.com BV $30 · level B B Gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/dlelist.com) - [dlehunt.com BV $15 · level B · nofollow C Gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/dlehunt.com) - [higherorlowergame.com BV $25 · level C C Gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/higherorlowergame.com) - [dledirectory.com BV $16 · level B B Gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/dledirectory.com) More like it: [Forum, profile and PR backlink sites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/level/c) · [Backlink sites worth $100 to $249 a link](https://mxverify.uk/publications/value/100-249) · [Entertainment websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/entertainment) · [Old websites from the 90s](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/1990s) How to use this report 3 ways to use these figures - **Price check.** BV puts one new followed link from fandom.com at $147 (level C), priced on a blend of link types (B 1% · C 90% · D 9%): $73 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $184 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $1,477 before relevance. A quote far above $185 for a level C link pays for what BV does not measure. · [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#value) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#use) - **Qualification and risk.** Its Site Strength is 90 / 100; the link it usually gives is mostly level C — usually neutralised (a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link). In the 10 articles we read, 88% of the links to other sites are nofollow, sponsored or ugc. The spam score of its links is 22 (0–100, the linking pages' average), not fandom.com's own. · [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#bv-detail) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#levels) - **Traffic reality check.** Set any traffic claim beside the Sept 2026 estimate: 714.8M monthly visits, 73% from organic search (524.1M). Visits fell 15% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. · [Traffic in detail](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#traffic) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#traffic) What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: [How to read a site report](https://mxverify.uk/guide). Quick answers about fandom.com 9 questions answered ### What is a link from fandom.com worth? BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.9, a new followed link from fandom.com is worth about $147 (level C). Relevance moves it: $73 to an unrelated site, $184 to a same-topic site. In short: a link from fandom.com is worth about $147 to rankings, up to $184 on the same topic. Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology) ### Is a link from fandom.com worth placing? That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.9, a link from fandom.com is worth $1,477 as an editorial citation (level A), $739 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $148 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $74 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $185 for a level C link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers. Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology) ### How does fandom.com's BV compare with other sites? At about $147 a link, fandom.com is in the “$100 to $249” value band, with 339 of the 4,378 sites valued on mxverify. 208 sites are in a higher band. In short: 208 of the 4,378 valued sites sit in a higher value band than fandom.com. Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update ### How much traffic does fandom.com get? fandom.com gets about 714.8M visits a month (Sept 2026), by a modelled estimate of all its visitors, not analytics measured on the site. 73% of them (524.1M) come from organic search. Visits fell 15% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. In short: fandom.com draws about 714.8M visits a month, down 15% since Jul 2026. Source: [third-party traffic estimate, Sept 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#evidence) ### Does fandom.com pass Core Web Vitals? No: real Chrome users see fandom.com's largest content load in 2.4 s (LCP), and at least one vital reported for it is not at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them. In short: fandom.com does not pass Core Web Vitals on real-user data. Source: [Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 1 Nov 2026](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux); [web.dev: Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals) ### Does fandom.com link out with nofollow? In the 10 articles we read, fandom.com made 49 links to other sites, and 88% of them were nofollow, sponsored or ugc; the other 12% were followed. BV prices a nofollow link at level C (×0.1), whatever the site is otherwise worth. In short: about 88% of fandom.com's outbound links are nofollow, so a new link placed there may be too. Source: [mxverify's reading of 10 articles, 5 Nov 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#reading); [Google Search Central: qualify your outbound links](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/qualify-outbound-links) ### How old is fandom.com? The domain fandom.com was registered in 1996, 30 years ago. Source: the public registration record; [RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083/) ### How many sites link to fandom.com? 340,202 websites link to fandom.com, each counted once. 41,487 of them (12%) link with nofollow. Source: [third-party backlink index, Nov 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#evidence) ### Has fandom.com been audited? No link placed on fandom.com has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements. In short: fandom.com's report is valued, not audited. How BV is worked out Site Strength 90 / 100 · level C · each factor and link type A followed editorial link from fandom.com would be worth up to $1,477 under BV 2.9, before relevance: its Site Strength is 90 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level C, worth about $147 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $73 and $184. - **Site Strength**: **90** / 100 ([how Site Strength is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)). Traffic: 524.1M estimated monthly organic visits, as of 4 November 2026. - **Worth up to**: $1,477 · before relevance — [how it is calculated](https://mxverify.uk/backlink-value#how) - **Usual link type**: Mostly level C — usually neutralised · B 1%, C 90%, D 9% → ×0.1 (each level's factor below, weighted by those shares) Read by Jev from our own reading of fandom.com's homepage and 10 articles; 88% of the links those articles make to other sites are nofollow, sponsored or ugc, and BV caps that share of a new link at C. No link placed here has been audited yet. - **Relevance to your site**: ×1 · neutral here ([range in an audit](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)) - **BV score**: **$147** per link - **Domain registered**: 11 October 1996 · shown for context ([how age is used](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)) ### A link from fandom.com, by link type A link from fandom.com at each level. [What each level means](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#link-levels). | Level | Factor | Value | | --- | --- | --- | | A — Counted | ×1 | $1,477 | | B — May be discounted | ×0.5 | $739 | | C — Usually neutralised | ×0.1 | $148 | | D — Network | ×0.05 | $74 | How fandom.com links out: the full reading 10 articles read · each link counted Read by mxverify on 5 November 2026: the homepage and 10 articles (10 linked from its homepage). This is our own reading of the site, not a vendor's figure, and it is what places a new link on the A–D scale until links placed here are audited. Strong sample 49 links to other sites across 10 articles. Strong takes six or more articles and thirty or more links, spread over at least two months where the articles are dated. **Links its articles make to other sites** - Followed 12% - Nofollow 88% - Sponsored 0% - User-generated (ugc) 0% 49 links to other sites across 10 articles, share buttons left out. BV counts 88% of a new link's weight at most C, because that share of the site's own links is nofollow, sponsored or ugc. **What its homepage offers** - **Advertising** · “Media Kit”, “Contact” ### Articles read | Article | Words | Links out | Followed | Says | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [The Remarried Empress Wiki \| Fandom](https://the-remarried-empress.fandom.com/wiki/The_Remarried_Empress_Wiki?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 3,026 | 43 | 6 | — | | [Community Central \| Fandom](https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Community_Central?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 661 | 0 | 0 | — | | [Community Programs Hub \| Community Central \| Fandom](https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Community_Programs_Hub?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 778 | 1 | 0 | — | | [Discord \| Community Central \| Fandom](https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Discord?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 759 | 5 | 0 | — | | [Discussions Moderation Requests \| Community Central \| Fandom](https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Discussions_Moderation_Requests?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 28 | 0 | 0 | — | | [I want a feature or extension turned on – Fandom](https://support.fandom.com/hc/articles/360021589413-I-want-a-feature-or-extension-turned-on?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 196 | 0 | 0 | — | | [I have a problem with another user – Fandom](https://support.fandom.com/hc/articles/360021273034-I-have-a-problem-with-another-user?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 158 | 0 | 0 | — | | [How do I use Fandom? – Fandom](https://support.fandom.com/hc/articles/360021256554-How-do-I-use-Fandom-?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 160 | 0 | 0 | — | | [My account is blocked – Fandom](https://support.fandom.com/hc/articles/360021261254-My-account-is-blocked?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 500 | 0 | 0 | — | | [I have found a bug – Fandom](https://support.fandom.com/hc/articles/360021261554-I-have-found-a-bug?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 141 | 0 | 0 | — | Jev, the model that judges every link in a bklink audit, reads these pages as a site whose links are mostly level **A** — A 57%, B 3.0%, C 37%, D 3.0%. Put together with what kind of site it is, how established it is, whether it sells placements and how it links out, a new link here is priced as A 0.2%, B 0.5%, C 90%, D 9.3%. Jev reads it as a platform where users post (74%), major as a source (31%), and not selling guest, sponsored or paid posts (60%). Traffic in detail engagement, top keywords, AI assistants Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, as of 4 November 2026: site-wide, all visitors, not analytics measured on the site itself. - **#47** global rank - **#31** rank in US - **50%** bounce rate - **4.1** pages per visit - **4m 25s** time on site **Every channel** - [Organic search](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/organic-search) 73% - [Direct](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/direct) 18% - [Referrals](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/referrals) 3.9% - [Social](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/social) 4.5% - AI assistants 0.2% - [Email](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/email) 0.2% - [Paid](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/paid) 0.2% - Affiliate and other 0% Share of all visits. Organic search is highlighted: it is the traffic BV prices on. **Top search keywords** | Keyword | Searches / mo | CPC | Ad value / mo | Visits (est.) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [valheim wiki](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/valheim-wiki) | 301K | $3.46 | $1M | 387.3K | | [blox fruit stock](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/blox-fruit-stock) | 1.5M | $0.31 | $465K | 268.2K | | [blox fruits codes](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/blox-fruits-codes) | 673K | $0.03 | $20.2K | 266.6K | | [fandom](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/fandom) | 368K | $2.19 | $805.9K | 227.8K | | [doors wiki](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/doors-wiki) | 201K | — | — | 211.7K | Searches, CPC and ad value: Google Ads, worldwide, its latest month, where it has the keyword; † third-party traffic estimates where it does not (the two often differ several times over). Ad value: what a month of the keyword's searches would cost as search ads (searches × cost per click) — what advertisers pay for it, not how hard it is to rank for. Visits (est.): the traffic estimate's own figure for the keyword on this site, which behaves like visits a month, not an amount of money. Each keyword opens the list of sites where it is a top search keyword. ### AI assistants AI assistants sent about **1.7M** visits in Sept 2026 — 0.2% of all visits. Each assistant's share of those visits, by month: [ChatGPT](https://mxverify.uk/publications/ai/chatgpt) [Gemini](https://mxverify.uk/publications/ai/gemini) [Perplexity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/ai/perplexity) ChatGPT: Jul 2026 65%, Aug 2026 72%, Sept 2026 23%; Gemini: Jul 2026 21%, Aug 2026 23%, Sept 2026 6.3%; Perplexity: Jul 2026 3.3%, Aug 2026 2.4%, Sept 2026 0.6% | Assistant | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Sept 2026 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ChatGPT | 65% | 72% | 23% | | Gemini | 21% | 23% | 6.3% | | Perplexity | 3.3% | 2.4% | 0.6% | Third-party traffic estimates. BV uses only the organic-search figure. Server and network a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites Its domain was registered in 1996. mxverify looked up fandom.com's address: it is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network. Its address is shared edge infrastructure used by unrelated sites, so it cannot show who else runs on the same server, and sharing the network is no sign of a connection. Cloudflare (CDN) fronts millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed. Where each figure comes from 8 figures, their sources and dates | Figure | Source | What it covers | | --- | --- | --- | | [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#value) | BV 2.9 | Site Strength × link type; link type from our reading of the site | | [Links placed here](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#links) | bklink audits | None audited yet | | [How it links out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#reading) | Read by mxverify | 49 links to other sites in 10 articles; read 5 Nov 2026 Strong sample | | [Traffic](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#traffic) | Third-party estimates | Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, site-wide and for all visitors, as of 4 Nov 2026 | | [Links to this site](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#links-in) | Third-party backlink index | 340,202 linking sites, read 5 Nov 2026; one reading a month | | [Authority](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#value) | Ahrefs Domain Rating | Half of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 5 Nov 2026; the rating itself is not shown | | [Server and network](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#server) | mxverify's DNS and ASN lookup | 162.159.142.170 · Cloudflare (CDN) · a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites | | [Domain age](https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com#hosting) | Domain registry (RDAP) | Registered 11 Oct 1996 | Limitations: what this report does not show 4 stated plainly - No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave. - A CDN address is shared by unrelated sites, so it says nothing about ownership; no neighbours are listed for it. - fandom.com gives more than one kind of link (B 1% · C 90% · D 9%), so BV prices a blend of them: an editorial link there would be worth $1,477 and a guest or sponsored one $739, before relevance. - fandom.com's visits fell 15% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. Half of Site Strength is organic search traffic, so a fall that lasts lowers BV when the figure is next read. What every report's figures can and cannot tell you: [how to read a report](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report). Compiled from [bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) audits · maintained by [Palash Bagchi](https://mxverify.uk/about) · updated 04 November 2026 --- Source: mxverify, "fandom.com Backlink Value & Traffic Report", https://mxverify.uk/publications/fandom.com (retrieved 2026-11-05). How every figure is worked out: https://mxverify.uk/methodology