---
title: "framed.wtf Backlink Value & Traffic Report"
url: https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf
description: "framed.wtf: a followed link from it is worth $41 by BV 2.9 (link type C). About 3.6M visits a month, 17% organic. 908 websites link to it. Not yet audited."
site: mxverify
generated: 2026-11-07T04:43:27.316Z
---

# Backlink value and traffic report for framed.wtf

**In short:** A new followed link from framed.wtf is worth about $41 to rankings by BV 2.9 (level C, Site Strength 60 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. It gets about 3.6M visits a month, 17% from organic search, up 9.7% since Jul 2026. No link placed on it has been audited.

First recorded 07 November 2026 · Last updated 07 November 2026 · [Visit framed.wtf](https://framed.wtf/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report)

[Compare](https://mxverify.uk/compare/framed.wtf#add)

Show framed.wtf's BV badge on your site

The badge shows what a link from framed.wtf is worth, as this report does, and updates by itself. It links to this report.

Embed code (HTML)

Copied

Paste it where the badge should appear.

## Backlink value · what one new followed link from framed.wtf is worth to rankings

[BV **$41** per link · level C · strength 60](https://bklink.uk/methodology?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report#bv)

reading confidence **Fair, 41 out of 100**

Reading confidence 41 / 100

- What we read 48
- Our model's certainty 100
- Its view of the pages 57

6 of 6 pages read had text · 0 links to other sites seen

How much of framed.wtf we read, and how sure our model was about the kind of link it gives. Never higher than what we read. [The full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#reading)

**Priced from our reading of the site.** No reliable sample of checked links yet: its link type comes from the articles mxverify read on the site. Priced 7 Nov 2026 · pages read 7 Nov 2026.

**Relevance to the linked site moves it**

**$20** unrelated ×0.5 **$51** same topic ×1.25

**By the kind of link it gives**

- A editorial $410
- B guest, sponsored $205
- C neutralised $41
- D network $20

[How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#bv-detail) · BV 2.9 · not a price anyone charges

**[3.6M](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#traffic)** monthly visits +9.7% since Jul 2026

**[608.5K](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#traffic)** from organic search 17% of visits

**[#13,165](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#traffic)** global rank

**[908](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#links-in)** sites link to it 280 of them nofollow

**[2022](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)** domain registered 4 years ago

**[1.2 s](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#tech)** page load for real users (LCP) does not pass Core Web Vitals

## How it compares · among 88 gaming sites on mxverify

- More monthly visits than 79% of the 88 gaming sites on mxverify.
- 17% of its visits come from organic search; the median gaming site gets 42%.
- AI assistants send 0.2% of its visits, about 60% of the 0.3% the median gaming site gets.
- A new followed link from it is worth less than a link from 51% of gaming sites.
- Priced at level C, like 47% of gaming sites; 2% are level A.

Peers are the most specific group of at least 20 sites on mxverify it belongs to: its topic, its category or its kind of site. Figures are third-party traffic estimates and mxverify's BV, as elsewhere on this report.

**Monthly visits**

Jul 2026: 3.3M visits; Aug 2026: 3.6M visits; Sept 2026: 3.6M visits

**Where visitors come from**

Direct 77%, Organic search 17%, Referrals 3.1%, Email 1.4%, Social 0.9%

- [Direct](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/direct) **77%**
- [Organic search](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/organic-search) **17%**
- [Referrals](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/referrals) **3.1%**
- [Email](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/email) **1.4%**
- [Social](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/social) **0.9%**

Organic search, in green, is the traffic BV prices on.

**Top countries**

- [United States](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/united-states) 40%
- [United Kingdom](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/united-kingdom) 12%
- [Australia](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/australia) 7.2%
- [Canada](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/canada) 5.1%
- [Spain](https://mxverify.uk/publications/audience/spain) 3.9%
- Other countries 32%

## Links to this site

Links other sites have made to framed.wtf, from outside link indexes: not the links placed on it that bklink audits.

**908** websites link to it 280 of them with nofollow links

**19.2K** links in all, from those websites about 21 per website · first seen 2022

**21** spam score of its links 0–100, the linking pages' average

**752** IP addresses they link from 564 subnets

**Where the links sit:** 30% in the article or main content of the linking page, 5.6% in its header, menu, sidebar or footer · 61% in no page section the index could name, the rest in other sections; of the 7,252 links it sorted by where they sit

**Pages in Google:** about 136 · the count Google gives for a site: search, its own estimate, which can be far off either way

What Google shows for site:framed.wtf — the first 10 pages

1. [Framed - The daily movie guessing game](https://framed.wtf/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/
2. [Oscars 2026: Community Prediction Results](https://framed.wtf/oscars?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/oscars · Mar 15, 2026
3. [Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) shop.framed.wtf/
4. [Archive](https://framed.wtf/archive?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/archive
5. [Stats](https://framed.wtf/stats?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/stats
6. [Instructions](https://framed.wtf/instructions?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/instructions
7. [Titleshot Challenge](https://framed.wtf/titleshot?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/titleshot
8. [Poster Challenge](https://framed.wtf/poster?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/poster
9. [One Frame Challenge](https://framed.wtf/one-frame?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/one-frame
10. [Poster Archive](https://framed.wtf/archive/poster?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) framed.wtf/archive/poster

Sources: link counts and spam score from a third-party backlink index, read 07 November 2026; the chart grows by one reading a month; page count and pages from a Google site: search, 07 November 2026. BV prices on one of these only, the page count: when two site: searches at least 7 days apart both find no pages, and nothing on record shows Google indexing the site, a link from it is priced at most level C.

## Links placed here

No link placed on framed.wtf has been audited yet. [An audit on bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) checks each one — still there, followed or not, where it sits — and marks this report audited.

This report's link to framed.wtf is nofollow. It is followed when the site's owner audits framed.wtf's own backlinks on bklink.uk, chooses to publish it and proves the site is theirs (for 90 days from each audit), or once a one-time payment of $9 is made for it. [When a link here is followed](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#followed-links)

## How it links out

No links to other sites in the 6 articles read.

Thin sample Read 7 Nov 2026 · [the full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#reading)

## Domain and hosting

- **Domain registered**: [14 March 2022](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)
- **Content category**: [gaming](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/gaming)
- **Server address**: 172.67.69.96 · CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites
- **Hosting network**: Cloudflare (CDN) · AS13335 · US

## Tech stack

- [Built onNext.js](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs)
- [Served byCloudflare](https://mxverify.uk/publications/tech/cloudflare)
- [Ad loadAd-heavy · 11 ad networks](https://mxverify.uk/publications/ads/heavy)

### Publisher signals

- ✗ Author bylines: none marked up on the homepage
- ✗ About page: not linked from the homepage
- ✗ Editorial policy: not linked from the homepage
- ✗ Contact page: not linked from the homepage

Structured data: none on the homepage. The homepage only; BV does not price on these.

### Page speed

Chrome users, 28 days to 4 Nov 2026: LCP 1.2 s · INP 184 ms · CLS 0.12 — does not pass Core Web Vitals. Data from the Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0.

Devices: 71% phone · 28% desktop · 1% tablet — share of Chrome page loads, same 28 days.

Sources: homepage read 07 Nov 2026; ad load from a web technology index, 07 Nov 2026.

## Social profiles

- [@framedwtf 3,852 ✓](https://mxverify.uk/publications/social/x) [↗](https://x.com/framedwtf)
- [@framedwtf 371 ✓](https://mxverify.uk/publications/social/instagram) [↗](https://www.instagram.com/framedwtf/)
- [@framedwtf 106](https://mxverify.uk/publications/social/tiktok) [↗](https://www.tiktok.com/@framedwtf)
- [framed.wtf](https://mxverify.uk/publications/social/bluesky) [↗](https://bsky.app/profile/framed.wtf)

**Combined followers** 4,329 across 3 profiles

| Platform | Followers | On since | Posts / videos |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| X | 3,852 | 2022 | 220 posts |
| Instagram | 371 |  | 13 posts |
| TikTok | 106 |  | 45 videos |

**Followers by platform**

Followers by platform: X 89%, Instagram 8.6%, TikTok 2.4%

- 89% 3,852
- 8.6% 371
- 2.4% 106

Profiles framed.wtf names for itself, read 07 Nov 2026 · how these are read

The profiles framed.wtf names for itself, in its structured data or linked from its homepage, read 07 Nov 2026. They are the accounts the site points to, not a check of who runs them. A pill opens the sites with a profile on that platform; the arrow opens the profile. Follower counts as of 07 Nov 2026. A tick: the profile's own website field names this site.

Combined followers adds each profile's count: the same person can follow on more than one platform, and YouTube rounds its figure. The donut splits it by platform, each in its brand colour. On since is the year the account began. Posts and videos are all-time totals. All read from each profile page.

## Similar sites

Matched on the subject the two sites share. Never a site on the same server or network.

- [songless.online BV $13 · level C C Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/songless.online)
- [cinenerdle.app BV $14 · level C C Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cinenerdle.app)
- [songquiz.io BV $20 · level C C Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/songquiz.io)
- [nme.com BV $389 · level B B Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/nme.com)
- [dles.gg BV $39 · level C C Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/dles.gg)
- [dledirectory.com BV $16 · level B B Entertainment and celebrity](https://mxverify.uk/publications/dledirectory.com)

More like it: [Forum, profile and PR backlink sites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/level/c) · [Backlink sites worth $10 to $49 a link](https://mxverify.uk/publications/value/10-49) · [Gaming blogs and game sites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/gaming) · [Next.js websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs) · [New websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)

How to use this report 3 ways to use these figures

- **Price check.** BV puts one new followed link from framed.wtf at $41 (level C): $20 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $51 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $410 before relevance. A quote far above $51 for a level C link pays for what BV does not measure. · [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#value) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#use)
- **Qualification and risk.** Its Site Strength is 60 / 100; the link it usually gives is level C — usually neutralised (a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link). The spam score of its links is 21 (0–100, the linking pages' average), not framed.wtf's own. · [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#bv-detail) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#levels)
- **Traffic reality check.** Set any traffic claim beside the Sept 2026 estimate: 3.6M monthly visits, 17% from organic search (608.5K). Visits rose 9.7% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. Its top keyword by Visits (est.) is “guess the movie”, about 14.2K a month; the ad value beside it is the whole market's. · [Traffic in detail](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#traffic) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#traffic)

What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: [How to read a site report](https://mxverify.uk/guide).

Quick answers about framed.wtf 8 questions answered

### What is a link from framed.wtf worth?

BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.9, a new followed link from framed.wtf is worth about $41 (level C). Relevance moves it: $20 to an unrelated site, $51 to a same-topic site.

In short: a link from framed.wtf is worth about $41 to rankings, up to $51 on the same topic.

Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology)

### Is a link from framed.wtf worth placing?

That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.9, a link from framed.wtf is worth $410 as an editorial citation (level A), $205 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $41 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $20 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $51 for a level C link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers.

Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology)

### How does framed.wtf's BV compare with other sites?

At about $41 a link, framed.wtf is in the “$10 to $49” value band, with 1,198 of the 4,471 sites valued on mxverify. 990 sites are in a higher band.

In short: 990 of the 4,471 valued sites sit in a higher value band than framed.wtf.

Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update

### How much traffic does framed.wtf get?

framed.wtf gets about 3.6M visits a month (Sept 2026), by a modelled estimate of all its visitors, not analytics measured on the site. 17% of them (608.5K) come from organic search. Visits rose 9.7% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026.

In short: framed.wtf draws about 3.6M visits a month, up 9.7% since Jul 2026.

Source: [third-party traffic estimate, Sept 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#evidence)

### Does framed.wtf pass Core Web Vitals?

No: real Chrome users see framed.wtf's largest content load in 1.2 s (LCP), and at least one vital reported for it is not at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them.

In short: framed.wtf does not pass Core Web Vitals on real-user data.

Source: [Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 4 Nov 2026](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux); [web.dev: Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals)

### How old is framed.wtf?

The domain framed.wtf was registered in 2022, 4 years ago.

Source: the public registration record; [RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083/)

### How many sites link to framed.wtf?

908 websites link to framed.wtf, each counted once. 280 of them (31%) link with nofollow.

Source: [third-party backlink index, Nov 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#evidence)

### Has framed.wtf been audited?

No link placed on framed.wtf has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements.

In short: framed.wtf's report is valued, not audited.

How BV is worked out Site Strength 60 / 100 · level C · each factor and link type

A followed editorial link from framed.wtf would be worth up to $410 under BV 2.9, before relevance: its Site Strength is 60 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level C, worth about $41 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $20 and $51.

- **Site Strength**: **60** / 100 ([how Site Strength is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)). Traffic: 608.5K estimated monthly organic visits, as of 7 November 2026.
- **Worth up to**: $410 · before relevance — [how it is calculated](https://mxverify.uk/backlink-value#how)
- **Usual link type**: Level C — usually neutralised → ×0.1 Read by Jev from our own reading of framed.wtf's homepage and 6 articles. No link placed here has been audited yet.
- **Relevance to your site**: ×1 · neutral here ([range in an audit](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report))
- **BV score**: **$41** per link
- **Domain registered**: 14 March 2022 · shown for context ([how age is used](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report))

### A link from framed.wtf, by link type

A link from framed.wtf at each level. [What each level means](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#link-levels).

| Level | Factor | Value |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A — Counted | ×1 | $410 |
| B — May be discounted | ×0.5 | $205 |
| C — Usually neutralised | ×0.1 | $41 |
| D — Network | ×0.05 | $20 |

How framed.wtf links out: the full reading 6 articles read · each link counted

Read by mxverify on 7 November 2026: the homepage and 6 articles (6 linked from its homepage). This is our own reading of the site, not a vendor's figure, and it is what places a new link on the A–D scale until links placed here are audited.

Thin sample 0 links to other sites across 6 articles. Strong takes six or more articles and thirty or more links, spread over at least two months where the articles are dated.

**Links its articles make to other sites**

No links to other sites in the articles read.

**What its homepage offers**

No guest-post, sponsored-post or advertising pages linked from the homepage.

Runs on Next.js.

### Articles read

| Article | Words | Links out | Followed | Says |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Motion Picture Enthusiast Embroidered T-Shirt \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/motion-picture-enthusiast-embroidered-t-shirt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 411 | 0 | 0 | — |
| ['Cinema Enjoyer' Embroidered Oversized T-Shirt \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/cinema-enjoyer-embroidered-oversized-t-shirt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 470 | 0 | 0 | — |
| ['Cinema Enjoyer' Classic Embroidered T-Shirt \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/cinema-enjoyer-classic-embroidered-t-shirt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 381 | 0 | 0 | — |
| ['Cinema Enjoyer' Embroidered Sweatshirt \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/cinema-enjoyer-embroidered-sweatshirt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 403 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [Framed Embroidered Logo Oversized T-Shirt \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/framed-embroidered-logo-oversized-t-shirt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 451 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [Framed Pastel Dad Cap \| Framed](https://shop.framed.wtf/products/beechfield-pastel-dad-hat?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 316 | 0 | 0 | — |

Jev, the model that judges every link in a bklink audit, reads these pages as a site whose links are mostly level **C** — A 28%, B 25%, C 47%, D 0%. Put together with what kind of site it is, how established it is, whether it sells placements and how it links out, a new link here is priced as A 0%, B 0%, C 100%, D 0%.

Jev reads it as a service or app (100%), small or niche as a source (76%), and not selling guest, sponsored or paid posts (98%).

Traffic in detail engagement, top keywords, AI assistants · AI crawler access

Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, as of 7 November 2026: site-wide, all visitors, not analytics measured on the site itself.

- **#13,165** global rank
- **#6,767** rank in US
- **51%** bounce rate
- **4.9** pages per visit
- **2m 27s** time on site

**Every channel**

- [Organic search](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/organic-search) 17%
- [Direct](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/direct) 77%
- [Referrals](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/referrals) 3.1%
- [Social](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/social) 0.9%
- AI assistants 0.2%
- [Email](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/email) 1.4%
- [Paid](https://mxverify.uk/publications/traffic/paid) 0.3%
- Affiliate and other 0.0%

Share of all visits. Organic search is highlighted: it is the traffic BV prices on.

**Top search keywords**

| Keyword | Searches / mo | CPC | Ad value / mo | Visits (est.) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [framed](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/framed) | 450K | $4.13 | $1.9M | 183.5K |
| [framed game](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/framed-game) | 60.5K | $1.67 | $101K | 32.8K |
| [guess the movie](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/guess-the-movie) | 135K | $2.03 | $274.1K | 14.2K |
| [framed wtf](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/framed-wtf) | 49.5K | $1.46 | $72.3K | 6,590 |
| [movie wordle](https://mxverify.uk/keywords/movie-wordle) | 27.1K | $0.54 | $14.6K | 5,490 |

Searches, CPC and ad value: Google Ads, worldwide, its latest month, where it has the keyword; † third-party traffic estimates where it does not (the two often differ several times over). Ad value: what a month of the keyword's searches would cost as search ads (searches × cost per click) — what advertisers pay for it, not how hard it is to rank for. Visits (est.): the traffic estimate's own figure for the keyword on this site, which behaves like visits a month, not an amount of money. Each keyword opens the list of sites where it is a top search keyword.

### AI assistants

AI assistants sent about **5,806** visits in Sept 2026 — 0.2% of all visits. Each assistant's share of those visits, by month:

[ChatGPT](https://mxverify.uk/publications/ai/chatgpt)

ChatGPT: Jul 2026 60%, Aug 2026 91%, Sept 2026 39%

| Assistant | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Sept 2026 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ChatGPT | 60% | 91% | 39% |

**AI crawler access**

framed.wtf has no robots.txt rules, which leaves every crawler allowed.

| Crawler | robots.txt |
| --- | --- |
| AI searchCrawls when an assistant searches the web for an answer |  |
| ChatGPT OAI-SearchBot | ✓Allowed |
| Claude Claude-SearchBot | ✓Allowed |
| Perplexity PerplexityBot | ✓Allowed |
| AI trainingCollects text to train AI models |  |
| OpenAI GPTBot | ✓Allowed |
| Anthropic ClaudeBot | ✓Allowed |
| Google Google-Extended | ✓Allowed |
| Apple Applebot-Extended | ✓Allowed |
| Meta Meta-ExternalAgent | ✓Allowed |
| ByteDance Bytespider | ✓Allowed |
| Common Crawl CCBot | ✓Allowed |

Read from framed.wtf/robots.txt on 7 November 2026. robots.txt is a request that crawlers choose to follow; a site can also refuse crawlers at its server, which this card does not see. Google's AI Overviews use Googlebot, so Google-Extended does not affect them.

Third-party traffic estimates. BV uses only the organic-search figure.

Server and network a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites

Its domain was registered in 2022.

mxverify looked up framed.wtf's address: it is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network. Its address is shared edge infrastructure used by unrelated sites, so it cannot show who else runs on the same server, and sharing the network is no sign of a connection.

Cloudflare (CDN) fronts millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed.

Where each figure comes from 8 figures, their sources and dates

| Figure | Source | What it covers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#value) | BV 2.9 | Site Strength × link type; link type from our reading of the site |
| [Links placed here](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#links) | bklink audits | None audited yet |
| [How it links out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#reading) | Read by mxverify | 0 links to other sites in 6 articles; read 7 Nov 2026 Thin sample |
| [Traffic](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#traffic) | Third-party estimates | Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, site-wide and for all visitors, as of 7 Nov 2026 |
| [Links to this site](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#links-in) | Third-party backlink index | 908 linking sites, read 7 Nov 2026; one reading a month |
| [Authority](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#value) | Ahrefs Domain Rating | Half of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 7 Nov 2026; the rating itself is not shown |
| [Server and network](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#server) | mxverify's DNS and ASN lookup | 172.67.69.96 · Cloudflare (CDN) · a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites |
| [Domain age](https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf#hosting) | Domain registry (RDAP) | Registered 14 Mar 2022 |

Limitations: what this report does not show 2 stated plainly

- No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave.
- A CDN address is shared by unrelated sites, so it says nothing about ownership; no neighbours are listed for it.

What every report's figures can and cannot tell you: [how to read a report](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report).

Compiled from [bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) audits · maintained by [Palash Bagchi](https://mxverify.uk/about) · updated 07 November 2026

---

Source: mxverify, "framed.wtf Backlink Value & Traffic Report", https://mxverify.uk/publications/framed.wtf (retrieved 2026-11-07). How every figure is worked out: https://mxverify.uk/methodology