--- title: "reception.sh Backlink Value Report" url: https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh description: "reception.sh: a followed link from it is worth $10 by BV 2.9 (link type C). 6 websites link to it. Not yet audited. Served through Cloudflare (CDN)." site: mxverify generated: 2026-11-07T04:45:37.291Z --- # Backlink value report for reception.sh **In short:** A new followed link from reception.sh is worth about $9.74 to rankings by BV 2.9 (level C, Site Strength 10 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. No link placed on it has been audited. First recorded 27 October 2026 · Last updated 27 October 2026 · [Visit reception.sh](https://reception.sh/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) [Compare](https://mxverify.uk/compare/reception.sh#add) Show reception.sh's BV badge on your site The badge shows what a link from reception.sh is worth, as this report does, and updates by itself. It links to this report. Embed code (HTML) Copied Paste it where the badge should appear. ## Backlink value · what one new followed link from reception.sh is worth to rankings [BV **$9.74** per link · level C · strength 10](https://bklink.uk/methodology?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report#bv) reading confidence **Low, 11 out of 100** Reading confidence 11 / 100 - What we read 16 - Our model's certainty 68 - Its view of the pages 31 1 of 1 page read had text · 0 links to other sites seen How much of reception.sh we read, and how sure our model was about the kind of link it gives. Never higher than what we read. [The full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#reading) **Priced from our reading of the site.** No reliable sample of checked links yet: its link type comes from the articles mxverify read on the site. Priced 7 Nov 2026 · pages read 27 Oct 2026. **Relevance to the linked site moves it** **$4.87** unrelated ×0.5 **$12** same topic ×1.25 **By the kind of link it gives** - A editorial $48 - B guest, sponsored $24 - C neutralised $4.84 - D network $2.42 Priced on a blend of link types: A 1% · B 22% · C 76% → ×0.2. [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#bv-detail) · BV 2.9 · not a price anyone charges **[6](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#links-in)** sites link to it 1 of them nofollow **[2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)** domain registered expires Sept 2027 **[2.3 s](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#tech)** page load for real users (LCP) passes Core Web Vitals ## How it compares · among 378 company and product sites on mxverify - A new followed link from it is worth less than a link from 87% of company and product sites. - Priced at level C, like 37% of company and product sites; 3% are level A. Peers are the most specific group of at least 20 sites on mxverify it belongs to: its topic, its category or its kind of site. Figures are third-party traffic estimates and mxverify's BV, as elsewhere on this report. ## In its own words > Native in-app support chat for iOS apps. Native iOS apps use the Reception Swift package; React Native/Expo apps use react-native-reception; Flutter apps use receptionflutter; Reception hosts the service and the team's inbox. From reception.sh's [llms.txt](https://reception.sh/llms.txt?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report), the file a site publishes to describe itself to AI assistants, fetched 7 November 2026. The words are the site's own; mxverify has not checked them. Its file lists 8 sections: Set up, Change an existing integration, Get started, App integration, Customization, Dashboard, Chat actions, Integrations. More like it: [Forum, profile and PR backlink sites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/level/c) · [Backlink sites worth under $10 a link](https://mxverify.uk/publications/value/under-10) · [Next.js websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs) · [New websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s) ## Links to this site Links other sites have made to reception.sh, from outside link indexes: not the links placed on it that bklink audits. **6** websites link to it 1 of them with nofollow links **9** links in all, from those websites about 2 per website · first seen 2026 **0** spam score of its links 0–100, the linking pages' average **6** IP addresses they link from 6 subnets Sources: link counts and spam score from a third-party backlink index, read 27 October 2026; the chart grows by one reading a month. BV prices on none of these. ## Links placed here No link placed on reception.sh has been audited yet. [An audit on bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) checks each one — still there, followed or not, where it sits — and marks this report audited. This report's link to reception.sh is nofollow. It is followed when the site's owner audits reception.sh's own backlinks on bklink.uk, chooses to publish it and proves the site is theirs (for 90 days from each audit), or once a one-time payment of $9 is made for it. [When a link here is followed](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#followed-links) ## How it links out No links to other sites in the 1 article read. Thin sample Read 27 Oct 2026 · [the full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#reading) ## Domain and hosting - **Domain registered**: [22 September 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s) - **Registration expires**: 22 September 2027 - **Server address**: 104.21.87.192 · CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites - **Hosting network**: Cloudflare (CDN) · AS13335 · US ## Tech stack - [Built onNext.js](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs) - [Served byCloudflare](https://mxverify.uk/publications/tech/cloudflare) ### Publisher signals - ✗ Author bylines: none marked up on the homepage - ✗ About page: not linked from the homepage - ✗ Editorial policy: not linked from the homepage - ✗ Contact page: not linked from the homepage Structured data: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication. The homepage only; BV does not price on these. ### Page speed Chrome users, 28 days to 24 Oct 2026: LCP 2.3 s · INP 77 ms · CLS 0.00 — passes Core Web Vitals. Data from the Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0. Devices: 18% phone · 82% desktop — share of Chrome page loads, same 28 days. Sources: homepage read 27 Oct 2026. How to use this report 2 ways to use these figures - **Price check.** BV puts one new followed link from reception.sh at $9.74 (level C), priced on a blend of link types (A 1% · B 22% · C 76%): $4.87 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $12 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $48 before relevance. A quote far above $6.04 for a level C link pays for what BV does not measure. · [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#value) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#use) - **Qualification and risk.** Its Site Strength is 10 / 100; the link it usually gives is mostly level C — usually neutralised (a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link). The spam score of its links is 0 (0–100, the linking pages' average), not reception.sh's own. · [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#bv-detail) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#levels) What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: [How to read a site report](https://mxverify.uk/guide). Quick answers about reception.sh 7 questions answered ### What is a link from reception.sh worth? BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.9, a new followed link from reception.sh is worth about $9.74 (level C). Relevance moves it: $4.87 to an unrelated site, $12 to a same-topic site. In short: a link from reception.sh is worth about $9.74 to rankings, up to $12 on the same topic. Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology) ### Is a link from reception.sh worth placing? That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.9, a link from reception.sh is worth $48 as an editorial citation (level A), $24 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $4.84 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $2.42 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $6.04 for a level C link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers. Source: [mxverify BV 2.9 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology) ### How does reception.sh's BV compare with other sites? At about $9.74 a link, reception.sh is in the “under $10” value band, with 1,852 of the 4,471 sites valued on mxverify. 2,188 sites are in a higher band. In short: 2,188 of the 4,471 valued sites sit in a higher value band than reception.sh. Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update ### Does reception.sh pass Core Web Vitals? Yes: real Chrome users see reception.sh's largest content load in 2.3 s (LCP), and every vital reported for it is at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them. In short: reception.sh passes Core Web Vitals on real-user data. Source: [Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 24 Oct 2026](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux); [web.dev: Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals) ### How old is reception.sh? The domain reception.sh was registered in 2026. Source: the public registration record; [RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083/) ### How many sites link to reception.sh? 6 websites link to reception.sh, each counted once. 1 of them (17%) link with nofollow. Source: [third-party backlink index, Oct 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#evidence) ### Has reception.sh been audited? No link placed on reception.sh has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements. In short: reception.sh's report is valued, not audited. How BV is worked out Site Strength 10 / 100 · level C · each factor and link type A followed editorial link from reception.sh would be worth up to $48 under BV 2.9, before relevance: its Site Strength is 10 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level C, worth about $9.74 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $4.87 and $12. - **Site Strength**: **10** / 100 ([how Site Strength is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)). Traffic: 0 estimated monthly organic visits, as of 27 October 2026. - **Worth up to**: $48 · before relevance — [how it is calculated](https://mxverify.uk/backlink-value#how) - **Usual link type**: Mostly level C — usually neutralised · A 1%, B 22%, C 76% → ×0.2 (each level's factor below, weighted by those shares) Read by Jev from our own reading of reception.sh's homepage and 1 article. No link placed here has been audited yet. - **Relevance to your site**: ×1 · neutral here ([range in an audit](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)) - **BV score**: **$9.74** per link - **Domain registered**: 22 September 2026 · shown for context ([how age is used](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report)) ### A link from reception.sh, by link type A link from reception.sh at each level. [What each level means](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#link-levels). | Level | Factor | Value | | --- | --- | --- | | A — Counted | ×1 | $48 | | B — May be discounted | ×0.5 | $24 | | C — Usually neutralised | ×0.1 | $4.84 | | D — Network | ×0.05 | $2.42 | How reception.sh links out: the full reading 1 article read · each link counted Read by mxverify on 27 October 2026: the homepage and 1 article (1 from across its sitemap). This is our own reading of the site, not a vendor's figure, and it is what places a new link on the A–D scale until links placed here are audited. Thin sample 0 links to other sites across 1 article. Strong takes six or more articles and thirty or more links, spread over at least two months where the articles are dated. **Links its articles make to other sites** No links to other sites in the articles read. **What its homepage offers** No guest-post, sponsored-post or advertising pages linked from the homepage. Runs on Next.js. ### Articles read | Article | Words | Links out | Followed | Says | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Privacy and data · reception docs](https://reception.sh/docs/privacy-and-data?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | 1,991 | 0 | 0 | — | Jev, the model that judges every link in a bklink audit, reads these pages as a site whose links are mostly level **A** — A 81%, B 7.0%, C 12%, D 0%. Put together with what kind of site it is, how established it is, whether it sells placements and how it links out, a new link here is priced as A 1.3%, B 22%, C 76%, D 0%. Jev reads it as a service or app (73%), small or niche as a source (87%), and not selling guest, sponsored or paid posts (98%). Traffic in detail no traffic data for this site · AI crawler access No traffic data for reception.sh: the estimate for Sept 2026 (as of 27 October 2026) is zero visits, which is how the traffic data marks a site it has no data on. A zero there is not a measurement, so no figure is shown. - **no data** global rank - **no data** country rank - **no data** bounce rate - **no data** pages per visit - **no data** time on site **AI crawler access** reception.sh's robots.txt lets every AI crawler below read the site. | Crawler | robots.txt | | --- | --- | | AI searchCrawls when an assistant searches the web for an answer | | | ChatGPT OAI-SearchBot | ✓Allowed | | Claude Claude-SearchBot | ✓Allowed | | Perplexity PerplexityBot | ✓Allowed | | AI trainingCollects text to train AI models | | | OpenAI GPTBot | ✓Allowed | | Anthropic ClaudeBot | ✓Allowed | | Google Google-Extended | ✓Allowed | | Apple Applebot-Extended | ✓Allowed | | Meta Meta-ExternalAgent | ✓Allowed | | ByteDance Bytespider | ✓Allowed | | Common Crawl CCBot | ✓Allowed | Read from reception.sh/robots.txt on 27 October 2026. robots.txt is a request that crawlers choose to follow; a site can also refuse crawlers at its server, which this card does not see. Google's AI Overviews use Googlebot, so Google-Extended does not affect them. Third-party traffic data. Server and network a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites Its domain was registered in 2026. mxverify looked up reception.sh's address: it is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network. Its address is shared edge infrastructure used by unrelated sites, so it cannot show who else runs on the same server, and sharing the network is no sign of a connection. Cloudflare (CDN) fronts millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed. Where each figure comes from 8 figures, their sources and dates | Figure | Source | What it covers | | --- | --- | --- | | [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#value) | BV 2.9 | Site Strength × link type; link type from our reading of the site | | [Links placed here](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#links) | bklink audits | None audited yet | | [How it links out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#reading) | Read by mxverify | 0 links to other sites in 1 article; read 27 Oct 2026 Thin sample | | [Traffic](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#traffic) | Third-party estimates | No traffic data for this site: its answer for Sept 2026 is zero visits, as of 27 Oct 2026 | | [Links to this site](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#links-in) | Third-party backlink index | 6 linking sites, read 27 Oct 2026; one reading a month | | [Authority](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#value) | Ahrefs Domain Rating | Half of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 7 Nov 2026; the rating itself is not shown | | [Server and network](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#server) | mxverify's DNS and ASN lookup | 104.21.87.192 · Cloudflare (CDN) · a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites | | [Domain age](https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh#hosting) | Domain registry (RDAP) | Registered 22 Sept 2026 | Limitations: what this report does not show 3 stated plainly - No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave. - A CDN address is shared by unrelated sites, so it says nothing about ownership; no neighbours are listed for it. - reception.sh gives more than one kind of link (A 1% · B 22% · C 76%), so BV prices a blend of them: an editorial link there would be worth $48 and a guest or sponsored one $24, before relevance. What every report's figures can and cannot tell you: [how to read a report](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#reading-a-report). Compiled from [bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) audits · maintained by [Palash Bagchi](https://mxverify.uk/about) · updated 27 October 2026 --- Source: mxverify, "reception.sh Backlink Value Report", https://mxverify.uk/publications/reception.sh (retrieved 2026-11-07). How every figure is worked out: https://mxverify.uk/methodology