---
title: "Backlink Value Report for revenuebug.com"
url: https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com
description: "revenuebug.com: a followed link from it is worth $57 by BV 2.8 (link type B). Not yet audited. Served through Cloudflare (CDN). Domain registered 2026."
site: mxverify
generated: 2026-10-26T11:18:25.839Z
---

mxverify · valued

# Backlink value report for revenuebug.com

It is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network, so its address is shared edge infrastructure and says nothing about who runs it. Its domain was registered in 2026.

**In short:** A new followed link from revenuebug.com is worth about $57 to rankings by BV 2.8 (level B, Site Strength 30 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. No link placed on it has been audited.

Last updated 26 October 2026 · [Visit revenuebug.com](https://revenuebug.com/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report)

[Compare](https://mxverify.uk/compare/revenuebug.com#add)

Show revenuebug.com's BV badge on your site

The badge shows what a link from revenuebug.com is worth, as this report does, and updates by itself. It links to this report.

Embed code (HTML)

Copied

Paste it where the badge should appear. It is a plain link and image: no script runs on your site.

## Backlink value · what one new followed link from revenuebug.com is worth to rankings

[BV **$57** per link · level B · strength 30](https://bklink.uk/methodology?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report#bv)

reading confidence **High, 78 out of 100**

Reading confidence 78 / 100

- What we read 84
- Our model's certainty 89
- Its view of the pages 88

10 of 10 pages read had text · 45 links to other sites seen · posts Sept 2026 – Oct 2026

How much of revenuebug.com we read, and how sure our model was about the kind of link it gives. Never higher than what we read. [The full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#reading)

**Relevance to the linked site moves it**

**$29** unrelated ×0.5 **$72** same topic ×1.25

**By the kind of link it gives**

- A editorial $114
- B guest, sponsored $57
- C neutralised $11
- D network $5.68

Priced on a blend of link types: A 4% · B 92% · C 4% → ×0.51.

[How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#bv-detail) · BV 2.8 · not a price anyone charges

**[2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)** domain registered

**[1.6 s](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#tech)** page load for real users (LCP) passes Core Web Vitals

**[0%](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#reading)** of its own links nofollow in the articles we read

More like it: [Guest post sites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/level/b) · [Backlink sites worth $50 to $99 a link](https://mxverify.uk/publications/value/50-99) · [Technology write for us sites and tech blogs](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/technology) · [Next.js websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs) · [New websites](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)

## Links to this site

Link counts for revenuebug.com are fetched at the next daily update, usually by 05:00 UTC, and shown here from then.

## Links placed here

No link placed on revenuebug.com has been audited yet. [An audit on bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) checks each one — still there, followed or not, where it sits — and marks this report audited.

This report's link to revenuebug.com is nofollow. It is followed when the site's owner audits revenuebug.com's own backlinks on bklink.uk, chooses to publish it and proves the site is theirs (for 90 days from each audit), or once a one-time payment of $9 is made for it. [When a link here is followed](https://mxverify.uk/methodology#followed-links)

## How it links out

**100%** of its links followed

**45** links to other sites

**10** articles read

Followed 100%

Fair sample Read 26 Oct 2026 · [the full reading](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#reading)

## Tech stack

- [Built onNext.js](https://mxverify.uk/publications/cms/nextjs)

### Page speed

Chrome users, 28 days to 24 Oct 2026: LCP 1.6 s · CLS 0.00 — passes Core Web Vitals. Source: Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0.

## Domain and hosting

- **Domain registered**: [29 September 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/registered/2020s)
- **Content category**: [technology](https://mxverify.uk/publications/category/technology)
- **Server address**: 188.114.97.3 · CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites
- **Hosting network**: Cloudflare (CDN) · AS13335 · US

How to use this report 2 ways to use these figures

- **Price check.** BV puts one new followed link from revenuebug.com at $57 (level B), priced on a blend of link types (A 4% · B 92% · C 4%): $29 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $72 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $114 before relevance. A quote far above $71 for a level B link pays for what BV does not measure. · [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#value) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#use)
- **Qualification and risk.** Its Site Strength is 30 / 100; the link it usually gives is mostly level B — may be discounted (a guest, sponsored or listed link). In the 10 articles we read, 0% of the links to other sites are nofollow, sponsored or ugc. · [How BV is worked out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#bv-detail) · [what this means](https://mxverify.uk/guide#levels)

What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: [How to read a site report](https://mxverify.uk/guide).

Quick answers about revenuebug.com 7 questions answered

### What is a link from revenuebug.com worth?

BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.8, a new followed link from revenuebug.com is worth about $57 (level B). Relevance moves it: $29 to an unrelated site, $72 to a same-topic site. BV is an estimate of ranking value, not a price anyone charges.

In short: a link from revenuebug.com is worth about $57 to rankings, up to $72 on the same topic.

Source: [mxverify BV 2.8 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology)

### Is a link from revenuebug.com worth placing?

That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.8, a link from revenuebug.com is worth $114 as an editorial citation (level A), $57 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $11 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $5.68 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $71 for a level B link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers. BV is an estimate of ranking value, not a verdict on the site or a price anyone charges.

Source: [mxverify BV 2.8 methodology](https://mxverify.uk/methodology)

### How does revenuebug.com's BV compare with other sites?

At about $57 a link, revenuebug.com is in the “$50 to $99” value band, with 260 of the 3,710 sites valued on mxverify. 406 sites are in a higher band. The counts are mxverify's own, taken from its directory at the last daily update.

In short: 406 of the 3,710 valued sites sit in a higher value band than revenuebug.com.

Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update

### Does revenuebug.com pass Core Web Vitals?

Yes: real Chrome users see revenuebug.com's largest content load in 1.6 s (LCP), and every vital reported for it is at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them.

In short: revenuebug.com passes Core Web Vitals on real-user data.

Source: [Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 24 Oct 2026](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux); [web.dev: Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals)

### Does revenuebug.com link out with nofollow?

In the 10 articles we read, revenuebug.com made 45 links to other sites, and 0% of them were nofollow, sponsored or ugc; the other 100% were followed. BV prices a nofollow link at level C (×0.1), whatever the site is otherwise worth.

Source: [mxverify's reading of 10 articles, 26 Oct 2026](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#reading); [Google Search Central: qualify your outbound links](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/qualify-outbound-links)

### How old is revenuebug.com?

The domain revenuebug.com was registered in 2026. Domain age is a fact from the registry record, not a measure of a site's quality.

Source: the public registration record; [RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses](https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9083/)

### Has revenuebug.com been audited?

No link placed on revenuebug.com has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements.

In short: revenuebug.com's report is valued, not audited.

How BV is worked out Site Strength 30 / 100 · level B · each factor and link type

A followed editorial link from revenuebug.com would be worth up to $114 under BV 2.8, before relevance: its Site Strength is 30 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level B, worth about $57 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $29 and $72.

- **Site Strength**: **30** / 100, in steps of 5 · half the site's authority rating, half its organic traffic on a log scale; 100 is the strongest site on the web. No traffic figure on record yet, so BV 2.8 counts it as none until one is fetched: the median measured site has about one visit a month.
- **Worth up to**: $114 · a followed editorial link at this strength, before relevance (×0.5 unrelated to ×1.25 same topic) — see [how it is calculated](https://mxverify.uk/backlink-value#how)
- **Usual link type**: Mostly level B — may be discounted · A 4%, B 92%, C 4% → ×0.51 (each level's factor below, weighted by those shares) Read by Jev from our own reading of revenuebug.com's homepage and 10 articles. No link placed here has been audited yet.
- **Relevance to your site**: ×1 · neutral here; in an audit it runs from ×0.5 (unrelated) to ×1.25 (same topic)
- **BV score**: **$57** per link
- **Domain registered**: 29 September 2026 · shown for context; BV does not price on age, but a domain registered in the last 30 days is never priced as not in Google

### A link from revenuebug.com, by link type

The same site is worth very different amounts depending on the link it gives you. This is what each level is worth here.

| Level | What it is | Factor | Value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A — Counted | An editorial citation: the site linked because it is useful to its readers. | ×1 | $114 |
| B — May be discounted | A guest, sponsored or placed article, or a product or tool directory listing. | ×0.5 | $57 |
| C — Usually neutralised | A press release or syndicated copy, a forum post, profile, footer or sidebar link — and any nofollow link. | ×0.1 | $11 |
| D — Network | A site on a server whose sites show footprints of one owner, a link farm, or machine-generated pages. | ×0.05 | $5.68 |

How revenuebug.com links out: the full reading 10 articles read · each link counted

Read by mxverify on 26 October 2026: the homepage and 10 articles (10 from across its sitemap). This is our own reading of the site, not a vendor's figure, and it is what places a new link on the A–D scale until links placed here are audited.

Fair sample 45 links to other sites across 10 articles published Sept 2026 – Oct 2026. Strong takes six or more articles and thirty or more links, spread over at least two months where the articles are dated.

**Links its articles make to other sites**

- Followed 100%
- Nofollow 0%
- Sponsored 0%
- User-generated (ugc) 0%

45 links to other sites across 10 articles, share buttons left out.

**What its homepage offers**

No guest-post, sponsored-post or advertising pages linked from the homepage.

Runs on Next.js.

### Articles read

| Article | Published | Words | Links out | Followed | Says |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Free SaaS Valuation Calculator \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/tools/saas-valuation-calculator?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | — | 223 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [Payment Processing Fee Calculator: Stripe vs Paddle vs Lemon Squeezy \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/tools/payment-processor-fee-calculator?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | — | 468 | 6 | 6 | — |
| [RevenueBug vs Acquire.com \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/compare/revenuebug-vs-acquire?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Oct 2026 | 240 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [Stripe vs Paddle \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/compare/stripe-vs-paddle?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Oct 2026 | 596 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [How to Value a Micro-SaaS Business \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/guides/micro-saas-valuation?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Sept 2026 | 2,021 | 11 | 11 | — |
| [SDE vs EBITDA: Which Earnings Metric Values a Small Business? \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/guides/sde-vs-ebitda?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Oct 2026 | 1,648 | 7 | 7 | — |
| [What Is Micro-SaaS? Definition, Economics, and Examples \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/guides/what-is-micro-saas?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Oct 2026 | 1,722 | 10 | 10 | — |
| [How Much Money Do Apps Make? \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/guides/how-much-do-apps-make?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | Oct 2026 | 1,709 | 11 | 11 | — |
| [Trika: Workout & Meal Planner \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/startups/trika-workout-and-meal-planner?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — |
| [Name to Avatar - Synthetic data that feels real \| RevenueBug](https://revenuebug.com/startups/name-to-avatar?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — |

Jev, the model that judges every link in a bklink audit, reads these pages as a site whose links are mostly level **A** — A 83%, B 16%, C 1.0%, D 0%. Put together with what kind of site it is, how established it is, whether it sells placements and how it links out, a new link here is priced as A 4.2%, B 92%, C 4.0%, D 0%.

Jev reads it as a directory or launch platform (66%), small or niche as a source (81%), and not selling guest, sponsored or paid posts (97%).

Traffic in detail no traffic data for this site

No traffic data for revenuebug.com: the estimate for Sept 2026 (as of 26 October 2026) is zero visits, which is how the traffic data marks a site it has no data on. A zero there is not a measurement, so no figure is shown.

- **no data** global rank
- **no data** country rank
- **no data** bounce rate
- **no data** pages per visit
- **no data** time on site

Third-party traffic data.

Server and network a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites

revenuebug.com is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network. Its address is shared edge infrastructure used by unrelated sites, so it cannot show who else runs on the same server, and sharing the network is no sign of a connection.

Cloudflare (CDN) fronts millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed.

Where each figure comes from 7 figures, their sources and dates

| Figure | Source | What it covers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [Backlink value](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#value) | BV 2.8 | Site Strength × link type; link type from our reading of the site |
| [Links placed here](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#links) | bklink audits | None audited yet |
| [How it links out](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#reading) | Read by mxverify | 45 links to other sites in 10 articles, published Sept 2026 – Oct 2026; read 26 Oct 2026 Fair sample |
| [Traffic](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#traffic) | Third-party estimates | No traffic data for this site: its answer for Sept 2026 is zero visits, as of 26 Oct 2026 |
| [Authority](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#value) | Ahrefs Domain Rating | Half of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 26 Oct 2026; the rating itself is not shown |
| [Server and network](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#server) | DNS and ASN registry | 188.114.97.3 · Cloudflare (CDN) · a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites |
| [Domain age](https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com#hosting) | Domain registry (RDAP) | Registered 29 Sept 2026 |

Limitations: what this report does not show 6 stated plainly

- No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave.
- A CDN address is shared by unrelated sites, so it says nothing about ownership; no neighbours are listed for it.
- A link that is followed is not necessarily a link search engines value; this record does not measure rankings or traffic.
- The BV score is what one new followed link from revenuebug.com is worth to rankings, from its Site Strength and the kind of link on offer. It is not a price, and it does not predict what a link will do for a particular site: relevance to that site moves it between half and one and a quarter times.
- Traffic figures come from a third-party traffic source, named with its date in the evidence box above; no one outside a site sees its analytics.
- revenuebug.com gives more than one kind of link (A 4% · B 92% · C 4%), so BV prices a blend of them: an editorial link there would be worth $114 and a guest or sponsored one $57, before relevance.

Compiled from [bklink.uk](https://bklink.uk/?utm_source=mxverify.uk&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=site-report) audits · maintained by [Palash Bagchi](https://mxverify.uk/about) · updated 26 October 2026

---

Source: mxverify, "Backlink Value Report for revenuebug.com", https://mxverify.uk/publications/revenuebug.com (retrieved 2026-10-26). How every figure is worked out: https://mxverify.uk/methodology
