mxverifyWhat a link is worth
mxverify / Publications / cloudtalk.io

mxverify · valued

Backlink value and traffic report for cloudtalk.io

It shares an address with 2 other publications in this directory, which is common on shared hosting and is not by itself evidence of common ownership. Its domain was registered in 2016.

In short: A new link from cloudtalk.io is worth about $196 to rankings by BV 2.8 (level B · nofollow, Site Strength 65 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. It gets about 685.7K visits a month, 27% from organic search, down 8.1% since Jul 2026. No link placed on it has been audited.

Last updated 20 October 2026 · Visit cloudtalk.io

Compare

Backlink value · what one new followed link from cloudtalk.io is worth to rankings

bklinkBV$196per link · level B · nofollow · strength 65
Relevance to the linked site moves it

$98 unrelated ×0.5$244 same topic ×1.25

By the kind of link it gives
  • A editorial$507
  • B guest, sponsored$254
  • C neutralised$51
  • D network$25

Capped by nofollow: priced at ×0.39, not ×0.5.

How BV is worked out · BV 2.8 · not a price anyone charges

685.7Kmonthly visits−8.1% since Jul 2026
185.3Kfrom organic search27% of visits
2016domain registeredexpires Oct 2026 · within 30 days
1.9 spage load for real users (LCP)passes Core Web Vitals
40%of its own links nofollowin the articles we read
2other publications on its server
Monthly visits
Jul 2026: 746,369 visits746.4KJul 2026Aug 2026: 741,997 visits742KAug 2026Sept 2026: 685,707 visits685.7KSept 2026
Where visitors come from
Organic search: 27%Direct: 54%Referrals: 4.5%Social: 2.8%AI assistants: 1.8%Email: 3.5%Paid: 6.9%27%organic
  • Direct54%
  • Organic search27%
  • Paid6.9%
  • Referrals4.5%
  • Email3.5%
  • Other channels4.6%

Organic search, in green, is the traffic BV prices on.

Top countries
  • United States14%
  • United Kingdom9.5%
  • Germany8.4%
  • Philippines7.8%
  • Canada7.0%
  • Other countries54%

How it links out

60%of its links followed
55links to other sites
10articles read

Followed 60%Nofollow 40%

Strong sample Read 20 Oct 2026 · the full reading

Tech stack

Page speed

Chrome users, 28 days to 17 Oct 2026: LCP 1.9 s · INP 174 ms · CLS 0.05 — passes Core Web Vitals. Source: Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0.

Domain and hosting

Domain registered
22 October 2016
Registration expires
22 October 2026 · within 30 days
Content category
technology
Server address
216.150.1.1
Hosting network
Amazon AWS · AS16509 · US

How to use this report

3 ways to use these figures
  • Price check. BV puts a new link from cloudtalk.io at $196 (level B · nofollow): $98 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $244 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed one would be worth $254 before relevance. A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $507 before relevance. A quote far above $317 for a followed level B link pays for what BV does not measure. · Backlink value · what this means
  • Qualification and risk. Its Site Strength is 65 / 100; the link it usually gives is level B — may be discounted (a guest, sponsored or listed link), with nofollow on 40% of its links (in the 10 articles we read). · How BV is worked out · what this means
  • Traffic reality check. Set any traffic claim beside the Sept 2026 estimate: 685.7K monthly visits, 27% from organic search (185.3K). Visits fell 8.1% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. Its top keyword by Visits (est.) is “cloudtalk”, about 26.5K a month; the ad value beside it is the whole market's. · Traffic in detail · what this means

What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: How to read a site report.

Quick answers about cloudtalk.io

8 questions answered

What is a link from cloudtalk.io worth?

BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.8, a new link from cloudtalk.io is worth about $196 (level B · nofollow). Relevance moves it: $98 to an unrelated site, $244 to a same-topic site. BV is an estimate of ranking value, not a price anyone charges.

In short: a link from cloudtalk.io is worth about $196 to rankings, up to $244 on the same topic.

Source: mxverify BV 2.8 methodology

Is a link from cloudtalk.io worth placing?

That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.8, a link from cloudtalk.io is worth $507 as an editorial citation (level A), $254 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $51 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $25 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $317 for a followed level B link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers. BV is an estimate of ranking value, not a verdict on the site or a price anyone charges.

Source: mxverify BV 2.8 methodology

How does cloudtalk.io's BV compare with other sites?

At about $196 a link, cloudtalk.io is in the “$100 to $249” value band, with 163 of the 3,369 sites valued on mxverify. 125 sites are in a higher band. The counts are mxverify's own, taken from its directory at the last daily update.

In short: 125 of the 3,369 valued sites sit in a higher value band than cloudtalk.io.

Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update

How much traffic does cloudtalk.io get?

cloudtalk.io gets about 685.7K visits a month (Sept 2026), by a modelled estimate of all its visitors, not analytics measured on the site. 27% of them (185.3K) come from organic search. Visits fell 8.1% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026.

In short: cloudtalk.io draws about 685.7K visits a month, down 8.1% since Jul 2026.

Source: third-party traffic estimate, Sept 2026

Does cloudtalk.io pass Core Web Vitals?

Yes: real Chrome users see cloudtalk.io's largest content load in 1.9 s (LCP), and every vital reported for it is at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them.

In short: cloudtalk.io passes Core Web Vitals on real-user data.

Source: Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 17 Oct 2026; web.dev: Web Vitals

How old is cloudtalk.io?

The domain cloudtalk.io was registered in 2016, 9 years ago. Domain age is a fact from the registry record, not a measure of a site's quality.

Source: the public registration record; RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses

Has cloudtalk.io been audited?

No link placed on cloudtalk.io has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements.

In short: cloudtalk.io's report is valued, not audited.

How BV is worked out

Site Strength 65 / 100 · level B · nofollow · each factor and link type

A followed editorial link from cloudtalk.io would be worth up to $507 under BV 2.8, before relevance: its Site Strength is 65 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level B (a guest, sponsored or listed link), but 40% of its links are nofollow, so it is worth about $196 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $98 and $244.

Site Strength
65 / 100, in steps of 5 · half the site's authority rating, half its organic traffic on a log scale; 100 is the strongest site on the web. Traffic: 185.3K estimated monthly organic visits, as of 20 October 2026.
Worth up to
$507 · a followed editorial link at this strength, before relevance (×0.5 unrelated to ×1.25 same topic) — see how it is calculated
Usual link type
Level B — may be discounted · nofollow on 40% of its links → ×0.39
Read by Jev from our own reading of cloudtalk.io's homepage and 10 articles; 40% of the links those articles make to other sites are nofollow, sponsored or ugc, and BV caps that share of a new link at C. No link placed here has been audited yet.
Relevance to your site
×1 · neutral here; in an audit it runs from ×0.5 (unrelated) to ×1.25 (same topic)
BV score
$196 per link
Domain registered
22 October 2016 · shown for context; BV does not price on age, but a domain registered in the last 30 days is never priced as not in Google

A link from cloudtalk.io, by link type

The same site is worth very different amounts depending on the link it gives you. This is what each level is worth here.

LevelWhat it isFactorValue
A — CountedAn editorial citation: the site linked because it is useful to its readers.×1$507
B — May be discounted · nofollow hereA guest, sponsored or placed article, or a product or tool directory listing.×0.5$254
C — Usually neutralisedA press release or syndicated copy, a forum post, profile, footer or sidebar link — and any nofollow link.×0.1$51
D — NetworkA site on a server whose sites show footprints of one owner, a link farm, or machine-generated pages.×0.05$25

40% of cloudtalk.io's links are nofollow, so a new link from it — a guest, sponsored or listed link — is priced at ×0.39: $196, where a followed one would be worth $254. BV prices the ranking value a link passes, and a nofollow link passes little.

How cloudtalk.io links out: the full reading

10 articles read · each link counted

Read by mxverify on 20 October 2026: the homepage and 10 articles (9 from across its sitemap, 1 linked from its homepage). This is our own reading of the site, not a vendor's figure, and it is what places a new link on the A–D scale until links placed here are audited.

Strong sample 55 links to other sites across 10 articles published Jul 2018 – Oct 2026. Strong takes six or more articles and thirty or more links, spread over at least two months where the articles are dated.

Links its articles make to other sites
  • Followed60%
  • Nofollow40%
  • Sponsored0%
  • User-generated (ugc)0%

55 links to other sites across 10 articles, share buttons left out. BV counts 40% of a new link's weight at most C, because that share of the site's own links is nofollow, sponsored or ugc.

What its homepage offers

No guest-post, sponsored-post or advertising pages linked from the homepage.

Runs on Next.js.

Articles read

Jev, the model that judges every link in a bklink audit, reads these pages as a site whose links are mostly level A — A 94%, B 4.0%, C 2.0%, D 0%. Put together with what kind of site it is, how established it is, whether it sells placements and how it links out, a new link here is priced as A 18%, B 30%, C 52%, D 0%.

Jev reads it as a publication (82%), small or niche as a source (56%), and not selling guest, sponsored or paid posts (93%).

Traffic in detail

engagement, top keywords, AI assistants

Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, as of 20 October 2026: site-wide, all visitors, not analytics measured on the site itself.

#69,820global rank
#9,522rank in GB
39%bounce rate
3.7pages per visit
3m 41stime on site
Every channel
  • Organic search27%
  • Direct54%
  • Referrals4.5%
  • Social2.8%
  • AI assistants1.8%
  • Email3.5%
  • Paid6.9%
  • Affiliate and other0%

Share of all visits. Organic search is highlighted: it is the traffic BV prices on.

Top search keywords
KeywordSearches / moCPCAd value / moVisits (est.)
cloudtalk30.2K$19.11$576.7K26.5K
vapi93.8K$0.48$45K3,460
aircall77.4K$18.03$1.4M2,510
cloud talk2,970$22.17$65.8K1,800
cloudtalk login1,050$0.00$01,030

Ad value: what a month of the keyword's searches would cost as search ads (searches × cost per click) — what advertisers pay for it, not how hard it is to rank for. Visits (est.): the traffic estimate's own figure for the keyword on this site, which behaves like visits a month, not an amount of money. Each keyword opens the list of sites where it is a top search keyword.

AI assistants

AI assistants sent about 12.6K visits in Sept 2026 — 1.8% of all visits. Each assistant's share of those visits, by month:

ChatGPTPerplexityGemini

0%50%100%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sept 2026ChatGPT, Jul 2026: 87% of AI-assistant visitsChatGPT, Aug 2026: 83% of AI-assistant visitsChatGPT, Sept 2026: 99% of AI-assistant visitsPerplexity, Jul 2026: 0% of AI-assistant visitsPerplexity, Aug 2026: 10% of AI-assistant visitsPerplexity, Sept 2026: 0.8% of AI-assistant visitsGemini, Jul 2026: 0% of AI-assistant visitsGemini, Aug 2026: 3.1% of AI-assistant visitsGemini, Sept 2026: 0.7% of AI-assistant visits
AssistantJul 2026Aug 2026Sept 2026
ChatGPT87%83%99%
Perplexity0%10%0.8%
Gemini0%3.1%0.7%

Third-party traffic estimates. BV uses only the organic-search figure.

Server and network

2 other publications on the server · 472 on the network

2 other publications in the directory run on 216.150.1.1, which is common on shared hosting and not by itself evidence of common ownership. 472 publications are on the same hosting network (Amazon AWS, AS16509) — a cloud platform hosting millions of unrelated sites, so that is no sign of a connection.

Other publications on 216.150.1.1

At this size that is ordinary shared hosting, listed for completeness, not as a finding.

Amazon AWS is a cloud platform hosting millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed.

Where each figure comes from

7 figures, their sources and dates
FigureSourceWhat it covers
Backlink valueBV 2.8Site Strength × link type; link type from our reading of the site
Links placed herebklink auditsNone audited yet
How it links outRead by mxverify55 links to other sites in 10 articles, published Jul 2018 – Oct 2026; read 20 Oct 2026 Strong sample
TrafficThird-party estimatesModelled estimates for Sept 2026, site-wide and for all visitors, as of 20 Oct 2026
AuthorityAhrefs Domain RatingHalf of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 20 Oct 2026; the rating itself is not shown
Server and networkDNS and ASN registry216.150.1.1 · Amazon AWS
Domain ageDomain registry (RDAP)Registered 22 Oct 2016

Limitations: what this report does not show

4 stated plainly
  • No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave.
  • A link that is followed is not necessarily a link search engines value; this record does not measure rankings or traffic.
  • The BV score is what one new followed link from cloudtalk.io is worth to rankings, from its Site Strength and the kind of link on offer. It is not a price, and it does not predict what a link will do for a particular site: relevance to that site moves it between half and one and a quarter times.
  • Traffic figures come from a third-party traffic source, named with its date in the evidence box above; no one outside a site sees its analytics.

Compiled from bklink.uk audits · maintained by Palash Bagchi · updated 20 October 2026