mxverifyWhat a link is worth
mxverify / Publications / videotourl.com

mxverify · valued

Backlink value and traffic report for videotourl.com

In short: A new followed link from videotourl.com is worth about $133 to rankings by BV 2.9 (level B, Site Strength 50 of 100); BV is an estimate, not a price anyone charges. It gets about 184.1K visits a month, 41% from organic search, down 5.2% since Jul 2026. No link placed on it has been audited.

First recorded 31 October 2026 · Last updated 31 October 2026 · Visit videotourl.com

Compare

Backlink value · what one new followed link from videotourl.com is worth to rankings

bklinkBV$133per link · level B · strength 50
reading confidenceCouldn't read

Our reader could not open videotourl.com: it refused us or did not answer in time. Its BV takes the usual link type until a later reading gets in.

Relevance to the linked site moves it

$66 unrelated ×0.5$166 same topic ×1.25

By the kind of link it gives
  • A editorial$267
  • B guest, sponsored$134
  • C neutralised$27
  • D network$13

Priced on a blend of link types: B 99% · C 1% → ×0.5.

How BV is worked out · Free API · BV 2.9 · not a price anyone charges

184.1Kmonthly visits−5.2% since Jul 2026
76.1Kfrom organic search41% of visits
#210,670global rank
312sites link to it80 of them nofollow
2026domain registered
2.8 spage load for real users (LCP)does not pass Core Web Vitals
Monthly visits
Jul 2026: 194,109 visits194.1KJul 2026Aug 2026: 98,974 visits99KAug 2026Sept 2026: 184,100 visits184.1KSept 2026
Where visitors come from
Organic search: 41%Direct: 39%Referrals: 12%Social: 7.5%AI assistants: 0.1%Email: 0.3%Paid: 0.4%Affiliate and other: 0.0%41%organic

Organic search, in green, is the traffic BV prices on.

Top countries

How it links out

videotourl.com did not let our reader in on 31 Oct 2026, so its link type is set by fixed rules until a later reading succeeds.

Read 31 Oct 2026 · the full reading

Tech stack

The homepage could not be read on 01 Nov 2026 (HTTP 404); it is tried again within a week.

Page speed

Chrome users, 28 days to 29 Oct 2026: LCP 2.8 s · INP 77 ms · CLS 0.01 — does not pass Core Web Vitals. Data from the Chrome UX Report (Google), CC BY 4.0.

Devices: 53% phone · 45% desktop · 2% tablet — share of Chrome page loads, same 28 days.

Domain and hosting

Domain registered
24 February 2026
Server address
104.21.34.106 · CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites
Hosting network
Cloudflare (CDN) · AS13335 · US

How to use this report

3 ways to use these figures
  • Price check. BV puts one new followed link from videotourl.com at $133 (level B), priced on a blend of link types (B 99% · C 1%): $66 to an unrelated site (×0.5), $166 to a same-topic site (×1.25). A followed editorial link (level A) would be worth up to $267 before relevance. A quote far above $167 for a level B link pays for what BV does not measure. · Backlink value · what this means
  • Qualification and risk. Its Site Strength is 50 / 100; the link it usually gives is mostly level B — may be discounted (a guest, sponsored or listed link). The spam score of its links is 13 (0–100, the linking pages' average), not videotourl.com's own. · How BV is worked out · what this means
  • Traffic reality check. Set any traffic claim beside the Sept 2026 estimate: 184.1K monthly visits, 41% from organic search (76.1K). Visits fell 5.2% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026. Its top keyword by Visits (est.) is “video to url”, about 980 a month; the ad value beside it is the whole market's. · Traffic in detail · what this means

What each figure means, and what it cannot tell you: How to read a site report.

Quick answers about videotourl.com

8 questions answered

What is a link from videotourl.com worth?

BV, mxverify's backlink value, is an estimate of what one new followed link from a site is worth to rankings: by BV 2.9, a new followed link from videotourl.com is worth about $133 (level B). Relevance moves it: $66 to an unrelated site, $166 to a same-topic site.

In short: a link from videotourl.com is worth about $133 to rankings, up to $166 on the same topic.

Source: mxverify BV 2.9 methodology

Is a link from videotourl.com worth placing?

That depends on the kind of link: by BV 2.9, a link from videotourl.com is worth $267 as an editorial citation (level A), $134 as a guest, sponsored or listed link (level B), $27 as a press-release, syndicated, profile or forum link (level C), $13 as a network link (level D), before relevance. A price far above $167 for a level B link pays for something BV does not measure, such as the site's own readers.

Source: mxverify BV 2.9 methodology

How does videotourl.com's BV compare with other sites?

At about $133 a link, videotourl.com is in the “$100 to $249” value band, with 307 of the 4,018 sites valued on mxverify. 176 sites are in a higher band.

In short: 176 of the 4,018 valued sites sit in a higher value band than videotourl.com.

Source: mxverify's own directory, counted at the last daily update

How much traffic does videotourl.com get?

videotourl.com gets about 184.1K visits a month (Sept 2026), by a modelled estimate of all its visitors, not analytics measured on the site. 41% of them (76.1K) come from organic search. Visits fell 5.2% from Jul 2026 to Sept 2026.

In short: videotourl.com draws about 184.1K visits a month, down 5.2% since Jul 2026.

Source: third-party traffic estimate, Sept 2026

Does videotourl.com pass Core Web Vitals?

No: real Chrome users see videotourl.com's largest content load in 2.8 s (LCP), and at least one vital reported for it is not at Google's good level. The figures are from the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0), the 75th percentile of real visits. Core Web Vitals describe how a page feels to its visitors; BV does not use them.

In short: videotourl.com does not pass Core Web Vitals on real-user data.

Source: Chrome UX Report, 28 days to 29 Oct 2026; web.dev: Web Vitals

How old is videotourl.com?

The domain videotourl.com was registered in 2026.

Source: the public registration record; RFC 9083: RDAP JSON responses

Has videotourl.com been audited?

No link placed on videotourl.com has been audited yet, so this report shows no rates for how its links behave. Its backlink value comes from site-level figures (its authority rating, traffic and our reading of its articles), not from audited placements.

In short: videotourl.com's report is valued, not audited.

How BV is worked out

Site Strength 50 / 100 · level B · each factor and link type

A followed editorial link from videotourl.com would be worth up to $267 under BV 2.9, before relevance: its Site Strength is 50 out of 100. The link it usually gives is level B, worth about $133 — and relevance to the site it points to moves that between $66 and $166.

Site Strength
50 / 100 (how Site Strength is worked out). Traffic: 76.1K estimated monthly organic visits, as of 31 October 2026.
Worth up to
$267 · before relevance — how it is calculated
Usual link type
Mostly level B — may be discounted · B 99%, C 1% → ×0.5 (each level's factor below, weighted by those shares)
We could not read this site's pages — it blocked our reader or did not answer — and no link placed here has been audited, so the default for a link inside an article applies. The table below shows the other levels.
Relevance to your site
×1 · neutral here (range in an audit)
BV score
$133 per link
Domain registered
24 February 2026 · shown for context (how age is used)

A link from videotourl.com, by link type

A link from videotourl.com at each level. What each level means.

LevelFactorValue
A — Counted×1$267
B — May be discounted×0.5$134
C — Usually neutralised×0.1$27
D — Network×0.05$13

How videotourl.com links out: the full reading

the site did not let our reader in

We could not read videotourl.com's pages when it was valued on 31 October 2026 — the site blocked our reader or did not answer — so its link type is set by fixed rules until a later reading succeeds.

Traffic in detail

engagement, top keywords, AI assistants · AI crawler access

Modelled estimates for Sept 2026, as of 31 October 2026: site-wide, all visitors, not analytics measured on the site itself.

#210,670global rank
#6,797rank in PK
43%bounce rate
2.9pages per visit
1m 07stime on site
Every channel

Share of all visits. Organic search is highlighted: it is the traffic BV prices on.

Top search keywords
KeywordSearches / moCPCAd value / moVisits (est.)
сделать урл ссылку на картинку0$0.00$01,190
video to url1,720$0.50$860980
mp4 to link2,310$0.74$1,709950
video to link5,710$0.37$2,113840
videotourl900$0.00$0800

Ad value: what a month of the keyword's searches would cost as search ads (searches × cost per click) — what advertisers pay for it, not how hard it is to rank for. Visits (est.): the traffic estimate's own figure for the keyword on this site, which behaves like visits a month, not an amount of money. Each keyword opens the list of sites where it is a top search keyword.

AI assistants

AI assistants sent about 239 visits in Sept 2026 — 0.1% of all visits. Each assistant's share of those visits, by month:

ChatGPTGemini

0%50%100%Sept 2026ChatGPT, Sept 2026: 69% of AI-assistant visitsChatGPT 69%Gemini, Sept 2026: 31% of AI-assistant visitsGemini 31%
AssistantSept 2026
ChatGPT69%
Gemini31%

Jul 2026 and Aug 2026: no data — every assistant reads 0, so those months are not charted.

At this volume the shares swing hard month to month: a handful of visits can move an assistant from 0% to 100%.

AI crawler access

videotourl.com has no robots.txt rules, which leaves every crawler allowed.

Crawlerrobots.txt
AI searchCrawls when an assistant searches the web for an answer
ChatGPT OAI-SearchBotAllowed
Claude Claude-SearchBotAllowed
Perplexity PerplexityBotAllowed
AI trainingCollects text to train AI models
OpenAI GPTBotAllowed
Anthropic ClaudeBotAllowed
Google Google-ExtendedAllowed
Apple Applebot-ExtendedAllowed
Meta Meta-ExternalAgentAllowed
ByteDance BytespiderAllowed
Common Crawl CCBotAllowed

Read from videotourl.com/robots.txt on 1 November 2026. robots.txt is a request that crawlers choose to follow; a site can also refuse crawlers at its server, which this card does not see. Google's AI Overviews use Googlebot, so Google-Extended does not affect them.

Third-party traffic estimates. BV uses only the organic-search figure.

Server and network

a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites

Its domain was registered in 2026.

mxverify looked up videotourl.com's address: it is served through Cloudflare (CDN), a content delivery network. Its address is shared edge infrastructure used by unrelated sites, so it cannot show who else runs on the same server, and sharing the network is no sign of a connection.

Cloudflare (CDN) fronts millions of unrelated sites, so sharing it says nothing about who runs a site. The count is shown; the sites are not listed.

Where each figure comes from

8 figures, their sources and dates
FigureSourceWhat it covers
Backlink valueBV 2.9Site Strength × link type; link type at the default until the site is read or audited
Links placed herebklink auditsNone audited yet
How it links outRead by mxverifyThe site did not let our reader in (31 Oct 2026)
TrafficThird-party estimatesModelled estimates for Sept 2026, site-wide and for all visitors, as of 31 Oct 2026
Links to this siteThird-party backlink index312 linking sites, read 1 Nov 2026; one reading a month
AuthorityAhrefs Domain RatingHalf of Site Strength, shown in steps of 5, as of 31 Oct 2026; the rating itself is not shown
Server and networkmxverify's DNS and ASN lookup104.21.34.106 · Cloudflare (CDN) · a CDN edge, shared by unrelated sites
Domain ageDomain registry (RDAP)Registered 24 Feb 2026

Limitations: what this report does not show

3 stated plainly
  • No link on this publication has been audited yet, so nothing here describes how its links behave.
  • A CDN address is shared by unrelated sites, so it says nothing about ownership; no neighbours are listed for it.
  • videotourl.com gives more than one kind of link (B 99% · C 1%), so BV prices a blend of them: an editorial link there would be worth $267 and a guest or sponsored one $134, before relevance.

What every report's figures can and cannot tell you: how to read a report.

Compiled from bklink.uk audits · maintained by Palash Bagchi · updated 31 October 2026